British Marines Ambushed in Afghanistan
June 22nd, 2008 | by MakingMarines |lookhearsee asked:
ITN’s Bill Neely reports during a firefight in Afghanistan. (March 27)
Marines Boot Camp Preparation Info
25 Responses to “British Marines Ambushed in Afghanistan”
By simrobin on Jun 25, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – so you think the tellytubbies are thrashing NATO and you still going to join the british army and serve under NATO in Afganistan. plonker. why not just end it now, kill yourself as by your reasoning you’re going to be thrashed when you go out to Afganistan. plonker. lol, lol. you say the stupidest things all the time. plonker.
By simrobin on Jun 26, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – you are a funny twisted fanatical muslim wack job, plonker. you ask for ‘Deans’ help and then insult him. you truely are a wack job, plonker. at least he’s given the Uk true support, unlike your oral support to the ‘Soldiers of Heaven’, lol, lol. are there any ‘Soldiers of Heaven’ left now or are they all in heaven now. have our troops killed them all. lol, lol.
By simrobin on Jun 26, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – since the M1 has thicked armour than the T90, it should be able to take more punishment. but since the T90 ran away in Georgia due its night site and its explosive army failing, i wonder if it will ever go into battle. plonker. lol, lol. funny thing was, all the T90′s failed in Georgia. now that is embarassing, very embarassing. but plonker. you still fail to understand, nothing on the battlefield is completely un-destroyable. plonker. its own you who gets it wrong. plonker.
By simrobin on Jun 28, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – since StarStreak 2 is the next generation, just coming it service now in the british army, incorporating an improved guidance system. it rides the beam, so when fired will travel in the direction fired as long as the operator carries on pointing at the target. its twin laser designator designed to make it more difficult to be detected. this info comes from the British army, so if you dont beleive it, you’re going to have problems believing anything they say. plonker.
By simrobin on Jun 30, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – since starstreak is a passive weapon in that it is guided to target by laser at mach 4, defeating Arena, capable of penetrating 1000 mm of RHA. the T90 is 900 mm in places so its more than possible. since the T90 has not been in any battle yet, its not meet Starstreak yet. plonker.
By simrobin on Jun 30, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – Arena fires out at 110 Degs, then explodes downwards. if you were capable of doing the math, that leaves 70 degs above Arena. plonker. this is all due to the fact Anera has to explode downwards to attempt to hit an incoming projectile. plonker. covering the top is not possbile due to this fatal flaw in its design. plonker.
By parsley67 on Jul 3, 2008 | Reply
thanks to the brits! if a few other nations would join in and fight like men this shit would be over soon.
By USArCOWARDS on Jul 5, 2008 | Reply
l8rthen,
You see youve proved youre a fool.
You read what simrobin says.
Bet you didnt realise hes 23 and unemployed.
I’m asking dean because he was a soldier.
He claimed to have experience in the area i commented on.
However in his last post he wrote:
“To be honest i dont no much about tanks”
Where as before he wrote:
“As an infantry man whos wored with tanks”
Making me think if hest as thick as simrobin. A guy who believes Nazis created missiles that could of attacked USA.
By USArCOWARDS on Jul 8, 2008 | Reply
Once again youre wrong
ARENA fires munition upwards above the tank Submunitions then rain down on incoming shells.
ARENAs the highest point of the tank so its impossible for it to leave the top unprotected
FV432s the strongest vehicle starsteaks destroyed. T90 armour is 3 times thicker
T90s Shtora also jams starstreak
Youre also missing the point
USAs tanks can be holed by shells T90′s cant be
Making T90 better
Why do you jewish yanks feel so inferior to Russia?
By ClayC33 on Jul 9, 2008 | Reply
God bless our allies!
By l8rthen on Jul 12, 2008 | Reply
Cowards, This is the only smart thing that I’ve ever seen you post. Because you asked for info instead of believing that any could exist in your tiny brain. Best if you superglued your lips together and asked simrobin and sean what you should say today. That way, people will not know that you are stupid.
By sangwria on Jul 14, 2008 | Reply
there’s no taliban
By tom2197 on Jul 17, 2008 | Reply
taliban got owend even wen they got ambushed lol
By simrobin on Jul 20, 2008 | Reply
“Dean” – i dont suppose you’ve heard plonker latest comments about the British army. he now says training for the British army is like, and i quote ‘Thats a joke the training course is fit for a 12 year old’. now thats what he thinks our training is like. thats exactly whats its like for those fanatical muslim’s, as they like their 12 years olds in that special PEDO way. but the question if somewhat redundant, as plonker will never get into the british army. we dont allow trash in like plonker.
By simrobin on Jul 23, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – the troops are exactly 24.567 m from the tank at all times, even when the tank is moving at top speed. use a bit of intelligence, plonker, oops if only. plonker.
By simrobin on Jul 25, 2008 | Reply
“UrPLonker” – again if plonker did his research, he would see arena fires out at 110 degs from the turret, which explodes downwards, thus leaving the remaining 70 degs above the turret open to a top down attack. does everything have to be exaplined to this plonker. the starstreak can penetrate 1000 mm of RHA, with the T90 only having 800mm RHA in places and since the Starstreak has a speed of mach 4, Arena only reacts to mach 2, it does not even have time to react. so its goodbye T90, plonker.
By Ghostuk7 on Jul 28, 2008 | Reply
wish i was there. gona go in for joining up again. as had to stop my traing due to a knee operation. gonna go really wish i was there. gud luk to all our boyz
By USArCOWARDS on Jul 30, 2008 | Reply
00000Dean00000,
So how close do infantry troops work in relation to tanks? (As in distance from the tanks)
And how often are the troops that close?
I thought tanks were mainly used to create a blitzkrieg effect.
But if you say they are dug in 90% of the time i believe you
By USArCOWARDS on Aug 1, 2008 | Reply
No
ARENAs protection is in a cone outward from the turret
The weapon used to destroy the incoming missile is fired upwards above the top of the tank. Where it spays munitions downwards onto the imcoming missile
Concidering ARENA is fired above the turret it would take a real fool to think top down attacks would work
And that 0.9Kg starstreak warhead would have any impact on a modern main battle tank such as a T90
RPG 29s only just strach the surface and they are 1.5kg warheads
By simrobin on Aug 1, 2008 | Reply
“UrPlonker” – so your emails to my youtube account, how does that add up. plonker. i reply to you public crap, but you have emailed me personally. plonker. you are a strange fanatical muslim wack job. in other forums he calls me a little giggling girl and we all know he likes 9 years old, his favourites, and talks about his male member. truely a sick, sick individual, a PEDO, wacking off at his keyboard. you dirty, dirty muslim wack job. plonker.
By simrobin on Aug 4, 2008 | Reply
“Urplonker” – if plonker bother to do any research, he would realise that Arena points downwards at an angle of 110 degs, hence the 30-50m range around the tank. this making the tank vulnerable to top down attacks, or using the Mach 4 Starstreak. plonker. when you get it wrong, you just have to go all the way. plonker.
By USArCOWARDS on Aug 5, 2008 | Reply
82ndairbornman,
You want stupid rants?
Check out simrobin.
Notice no one on he’s messaged him yet hes joined in with his jibberish?
The guy follows me around. He thinks he’s my bitch.
By USArCOWARDS on Aug 7, 2008 | Reply
00000Dean00000,
So how close do infantry troops work in relation to tanks? (As in distance from the tanks)
And how often are the troops that close?
I thought tanks were mainly used to create a blitzkrieg effect.
But if you say they are dug in 90% of the time i believe you.
ARENA’s ment to stop all topdown weapons such as the javerlin and hellfire missiles even when fired from helicopters.
As long as the missile doesnt travel faster than a speed of Mach 2 ARENA will stop the warhead.
By 00000Dean00000 on Aug 8, 2008 | Reply
yeah your correct – tanks can and do get used offensively, of course they do. Some things are best left unsaid, especially new gucci bits of technology that can be real advantage.
By 00000Dean00000 on Aug 9, 2008 | Reply
no, I’m saying 90% of the time all tanks are dug in – whatever nation. To move a tank is to expose its position and put it at risk – now, if you go on the offensive – a tank is a great weapon to attack an urban stronghold with. And to be honest with you im not great on info when it comes to tanks.